Investor clash on gas and nuclear affects EU green finance drive

Share:

European efforts to reach a common definition of sustainable investments risk fragmenting the market they aimed to unify, as investors are deeply divided over which energy sources should count as green.

A Reuters survey of 16 fund managers with $6 trillion in assets found investors were at odds over Brussels’ plan, drafted at the end of last year, to class investments in some natural gas and nuclear power as environmentally sustainable.

The split among investors could herald a divergence in the green credentials of funds meant to be sustainable, making it harder for ordinary investors to make a judgement and complicating Brussels’ attempts to set a clear standard.

Reuters states that “some say labelling nuclear and natural gas as green investments would aid the low carbon evolution by encouraging financing for facilities to help wean countries off the dirtiest fuels, chiefly coal. Others say nuclear and natural gas are part of the problem, not the solution.”

Although nuclear generates power without emitting carbon dioxide, the by-product of nuclear electricity is radioactive waste. A gas-fired power plant emits around half as much carbon dioxide as a coal-fired one but is far from carbon-free.

Of the 16 investors surveyed by Reuters, five said they did not consider gas and nuclear as sustainable, and four counted only one of the two fuels as green. Five deemed both gas and nuclear power to be green in some circumstances, and two did not specify their view.

While other parts of the EU taxonomy, or set of standards, came into effect this month, the rules on gas and nuclear power have been delayed by more than a year following intense lobbying from EU member states.

“Regardless of whether they are included or not, we would not consider them fully ‘green’,” said Gemma Corrigan, head of policy and advocacy at the international business arm of Federated Hermes, which manages $634B in assets.

The rules are meant to standardise disparate approaches and asset managers are required to report the extent to which their portfolios are aligned with the taxonomy.

Corrigan raised concerns about the impact on other sustainability reporting that is required should nuclear and natural gas be grouped with ‘green’ investments in those reports.

“Including nuclear and gas would create less transparency, a greater risk of mis-selling and potentially undermine the credibility of the regulations and benchmark for setting science-based standards,” she said.

Other investors flagged a danger that including gas and nuclear could undermine commitments by asset managers to drive down emissions associated with their portfolios to the EU target of zero, on a net basis, by 2050.

Mirova Chief Executive Philippe Zaouati said his firm would snub the EU’s “basically useless” green label for gas and nuclear and stick with the firm’s own sustainability assessment.

A spokesperson for the executive European Commission declined to comment on the Reuters survey. The Commission has previously defended its draft proposal’s “clear and tight conditions” for gas and nuclear investments, which it says are needed to “facilitate the transition towards a predominantly renewable-based future”.

Once the Commission publishes a final proposal for the rules, they could take effect from Jan. 2023, unless vetoed by a supermajority of EU member states or a majority of EU lawmakers.

The intensity of lobbying on the issue reflects how much is at stake for the nuclear and natural gas sectors that fear their cost of financing may rise if they are not included in the green taxonomy. From an investor point of view, their inclusion could broaden the range of eligible sustainable assets.

Members of an expert panel advising the Commission said this week the draft rules were not in line with 2050 net-zero targets because they included gas power plants with above-average emissions and nuclear plants that may launch too late to help cut emissions by 2050.

Jean-Jacques Barberis, director of the Institutional and Corporate Clients division & ESG at Europe’s biggest asset manager Amundi, said the industry needed common standards but would find a way.

“We will adapt to it, whether the European Commission decides to include gas and nuclear in the taxonomy or not,” Barberis said.

Source: Reuters

View our blog for market news and company updates.

italy

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Alternatives

Private Equity

No Data Found

Private Debt

No Data Found

Hedge Funds

No Data Found

Infrastructure

No Data Found

Real Estate

No Data Found

Collectibles

No Data Found

Italy

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Fixed Income

U.S. Treasuries

No Data Found

Eurozone Government

No Data Found

EM Debt

No Data Found

Investment Grade

No Data Found

High Yield

No Data Found

Convertible Bonds

No Data Found

Italy

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Equities

Global

No Data Found

Global EM

No Data Found

European

No Data Found

US

No Data Found

Japan

No Data Found

Asia ex Japan

No Data Found

Domestic

No Data Found

Frontier

No Data Found

Portugal

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Fixed Income

High Yield

No Data Found

Investment Grade

No Data Found

Convertible Bonds

No Data Found

EM Debt

No Data Found

Eurozone Government

No Data Found

Inflation-linked

No Data Found

Asset-backed Securities

No Data Found

US Treasuries

No Data Found

Portugal

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Equities

Global

No Data Found

Global EM

No Data Found

Asia ex Japan

No Data Found

US

No Data Found

European

No Data Found

Japan

No Data Found

Spain

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Alternatives

Private Equity

No Data Found

Private Debt

No Data Found

Hedge Funds

No Data Found

Infrastructure

No Data Found

Real Estate

No Data Found

Collectibles

No Data Found

Spain

2022-2023 HISTORICAL FINDINGS
Asset Allocation – Fixed Income

U.S. Treasuries

No Data Found

Eurozone Government

No Data Found

EM Debt

No Data Found

Investment Grade

No Data Found